Team | Year | Age | GS | G | IP | W | L | SV | BS | K | BB | H | HR | K% | BB% | HR% | LOB% | GB% | WHIP | BABIP | ERA | FIP | FIP- | xFIP | E-F | WAR | rWAR |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Denver - BLB
DEN - BLB
|
2012 | 35 | 0 | 1 | 2.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 0.0% | 7.14% | 14.3% | 31.3% | 57.1% | 2.57 | .273 | 15.43 | 15.76 | 402 | 6.63 | -0.34 | -0.27 | -0.31 |
Los Alamos - BLB
LAM - BLB
|
2005 | 28 | 0 | 22 | 29.1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 27 | 16 | 38 | 3 | 19.7% | 11.68% | 2.2% | 69.5% | 54.7% | 1.84 | .398 | 6.14 | 4.46 | 116 | 4.18 | 1.67 | -0.16 | -0.60 |
Denver (1 yrs)
DEN (1 yrs)
|
0 | 1 | 2.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 0.0% | 7.14% | 14.3% | 31.3% | 57.1% | 2.57 | .273 | 15.43 | 15.76 | 402 | 6.63 | -0.34 | -0.27 | -0.31 | ||
Los Alamos (1 yrs)
LAM (1 yrs)
|
0 | 22 | 29.1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 27 | 16 | 38 | 3 | 19.7% | 11.68% | 2.2% | 69.5% | 54.7% | 1.84 | .398 | 6.14 | 4.46 | 116 | 4.18 | 1.67 | -0.16 | -0.60 | ||
Total - BLB
BLB
|
0 | 23 | 31.2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 27 | 17 | 43 | 5 | 17.9% | 11.26% | 3.3% | 67.3% | 55.0% | 1.89 | .384 | 6.82 | 5.30 | 138 | 4.36 | 1.52 | -0.42 | -0.90 |
Team | Year | Age | GS | G | IP | W | L | SV | BS | K | BB | H | HR | K% | BB% | HR% | LOB% | GB% | WHIP | BABIP | ERA | FIP | FIP- | xFIP | E-F | WAR | rWAR |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tucson - AAA
TUC - AAA
|
2012 | 35 | 0 | 59 | 56.2 | 4 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 70 | 17 | 42 | 7 | 30.0% | 7.30% | 3.0% | 83.3% | 49.0% | 1.04 | .265 | 3.02 | 3.74 | 101 | 3.02 | -0.72 | 0.38 | 1.15 |
Tucson - AAA
TUC - AAA
|
2011 | 34 | 0 | 14 | 19.1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 5 | 23 | 4 | 25.0% | 5.95% | 4.8% | 75.9% | 41.2% | 1.45 | .352 | 4.19 | 5.01 | 133 | 3.39 | -0.82 | -0.17 | -0.11 |
Oklahoma City - AA
OKL - AA
|
2011 | 34 | 0 | 14 | 20.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 26 | 3 | 23 | 5 | 30.6% | 3.53% | 5.9% | 76.2% | 51.6% | 1.30 | .375 | 5.40 | 4.99 | 148 | 2.35 | 0.41 | -0.27 | -0.27 |
Little Rock - A
LIT - A
|
2011 | 34 | 0 | 10 | 10.2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 16 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 38.1% | 2.38% | 0.0% | 66.7% | 43.8% | 0.84 | .320 | 1.69 | 0.85 | 24 | 1.35 | 0.84 | 0.47 | 0.26 |
Tucson - AAA
TUC - AAA
|
2010 | 33 | 0 | 9 | 10.2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 3 | 20 | 0 | 18.5% | 5.56% | 0.0% | 60.9% | 47.6% | 2.16 | .488 | 7.59 | 2.83 | 72 | 3.88 | 4.77 | 0.24 | -0.26 |
Oklahoma City - AA
OKL - AA
|
2010 | 33 | 0 | 12 | 21.2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 26 | 4 | 18 | 0 | 29.2% | 4.49% | 0.0% | 73.9% | 44.7% | 1.02 | .316 | 1.66 | 1.98 | 57 | 2.69 | -0.32 | 0.65 | 0.54 |
Little Rock - A
LIT - A
|
2010 | 33 | 0 | 19 | 24.2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 29 | 6 | 19 | 1 | 28.7% | 5.94% | 1.0% | 81.3% | 46.5% | 1.01 | .286 | 2.19 | 3.13 | 77 | 3.12 | -0.94 | 0.45 | 0.81 |
Oklahoma City - AA
OKL - AA
|
2009 | 32 | 0 | 3 | 6.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 31.6% | 0.00% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 50.0% | 0.50 | .231 | 0.00 | 1.92 | 51 | 2.55 | -1.92 | 0.20 | 0.35 |
Little Rock - A
LIT - A
|
2009 | 32 | 0 | 29 | 36.2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 42 | 7 | 25 | 1 | 29.6% | 4.93% | 0.7% | 91.8% | 50.0% | 0.87 | .267 | 0.74 | 2.92 | 81 | 3.04 | -2.18 | 0.72 | 1.74 |
Oklahoma City - AA
OKL - AA
|
2008 | 31 | 0 | 32 | 47.0 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 62 | 11 | 40 | 4 | 32.3% | 5.73% | 2.1% | 75.4% | 46.6% | 1.09 | .321 | 2.87 | 3.32 | 88 | 2.82 | -0.45 | 0.75 | 0.80 |
Tucson - AAA
TUC - AAA
|
2007 | 30 | 0 | 4 | 8.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 25.8% | 3.23% | 3.2% | 107.1% | 66.7% | 0.72 | .200 | 1.08 | 4.37 | 110 | 3.46 | -3.29 | 0.03 | 0.39 |
Little Rock - A
LIT - A
|
2007 | 30 | 0 | 57 | 70.2 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 92 | 8 | 64 | 2 | 31.7% | 2.76% | 0.7% | 69.3% | 43.6% | 1.02 | .337 | 2.29 | 2.42 | 65 | 2.49 | -0.13 | 1.74 | 1.30 |
Oklahoma City - AA
OKL - AA
|
2006 | 29 | 0 | 40 | 53.1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 75 | 10 | 37 | 5 | 35.5% | 4.74% | 2.4% | 78.6% | 52.4% | 0.88 | .271 | 2.03 | 3.23 | 87 | 2.55 | -1.21 | 0.85 | 1.30 |
Oklahoma City - AA
OKL - AA
|
2005 | 28 | 0 | 3 | 4.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 23.5% | 11.76% | 5.9% | 83.3% | 28.6% | 1.25 | .222 | 2.25 | 6.77 | 190 | 4.47 | -4.52 | -0.13 | 0.00 |
Little Rock - A
LIT - A
|
2005 | 28 | 0 | 3 | 4.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 44.4% | 0.00% | 0.0% | 66.7% | 50.0% | 0.64 | .300 | 1.93 | 0.75 | 20 | 1.05 | 1.18 | 0.22 | 0.16 |
New York - AAA
NYS - AAA
|
2004 | 27 | 0 | 57 | 72.2 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 93 | 14 | 89 | 10 | 28.9% | 4.35% | 3.1% | 63.2% | 56.0% | 1.42 | .399 | 5.70 | 3.74 | 97 | 2.69 | 1.96 | 0.68 | -0.87 |
New York - AAA
NYS - AAA
|
2003 | 26 | 0 | 43 | 47.1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 65 | 14 | 48 | 3 | 31.7% | 6.83% | 1.5% | 83.6% | 60.0% | 1.31 | .375 | 2.66 | 2.53 | 75 | 2.32 | 0.13 | 0.99 | 1.09 |
New York - AAA
NYS - AAA
|
2002 | 25 | 0 | 9 | 6.0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 28.0% | 8.00% | 0.0% | 87.5% | 50.0% | 1.33 | .375 | 1.50 | 2.08 | 65 | 2.86 | -0.58 | 0.16 | 0.21 |
Buffalo - AA
BUF - AA
|
2002 | 25 | 0 | 27 | 37.1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 42 | 8 | 28 | 6 | 28.0% | 5.33% | 4.0% | 72.8% | 49.3% | 0.96 | .244 | 3.62 | 4.47 | 131 | 3.03 | -0.86 | -0.20 | 0.21 |
Erie - A
ERI - A
|
2001 | 24 | 0 | 53 | 61.2 | 3 | 3 | 18 | 3 | 75 | 15 | 46 | 3 | 29.8% | 5.95% | 1.2% | 73.7% | 61.5% | 0.99 | .285 | 2.63 | 2.84 | 84 | 2.50 | -0.21 | 0.79 | 1.01 |
Erie - A
ERI - A
|
2000 | 23 | 0 | 45 | 44.2 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 46 | 9 | 41 | 3 | 24.6% | 4.81% | 1.6% | 77.2% | 48.8% | 1.12 | .314 | 2.42 | 3.31 | 106 | 2.87 | -0.89 | 0.11 | 0.49 |
Erie - A
ERI - A
|
1999 | 22 | 0 | 31 | 36.0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 41 | 9 | 45 | 0 | 25.9% | 5.70% | 0.0% | 78.6% | 35.0% | 1.50 | .425 | 2.50 | 2.06 | 69 | 2.49 | 0.44 | 0.75 | 0.45 |
Erie - A
ERI - A
|
1998 | 21 | 0 | 14 | 17.1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 22 | 1 | 21 | 0 | 30.1% | 1.37% | 0.0% | 60.9% | 46.4% | 1.27 | .429 | 4.67 | 1.04 | 35 | 1.44 | 3.63 | 0.64 | -0.13 |
Hyannis - CCBL
HYA - CCBL
|
1998 | 21 | 0 | 27 | 22.0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 29 | 19 | 30 | 9 | 25.7% | 16.81% | 8.0% | 66.8% | 47.1% | 2.23 | .396 | 9.82 | 9.43 | 240 | 5.95 | 0.38 | -0.90 | -0.86 |
Hyannis - CCBL
HYA - CCBL
|
1997 | 20 | 0 | 24 | 20.0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 26 | 24 | 38 | 6 | 21.7% | 20.00% | 5.0% | 56.0% | 35.5% | 3.10 | .500 | 14.40 | 8.71 | 239 | 7.00 | 5.69 | -0.80 | -1.68 |
Hyannis - CCBL
HYA - CCBL
|
1996 | 19 | 0 | 24 | 20.0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 20 | 3 | 15 | 4 | 25.0% | 3.75% | 5.0% | 74.6% | 44.7% | 0.90 | .220 | 3.60 | 5.36 | 150 | 4.64 | -1.76 | -0.16 | 0.26 |
Total - AAA
AAA
|
0 | 195 | 221.0 | 12 | 8 | 20 | 7 | 274 | 56 | 233 | 25 | 28.7% | 5.87% | 2.6% | 74.3% | 53.4% | 1.31 | .358 | 4.03 | 3.53 | 95 | 2.85 | 0.51 | 2.30 | 1.61 | ||
Total - AA
AA
|
0 | 131 | 189.1 | 10 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 241 | 38 | 152 | 21 | 31.6% | 4.98% | 2.8% | 76.2% | 48.7% | 1.00 | .293 | 2.80 | 3.57 | 100 | 2.75 | -0.77 | 1.85 | 2.93 | ||
Total - A
A
|
0 | 261 | 307.0 | 18 | 4 | 27 | 7 | 371 | 56 | 272 | 10 | 29.4% | 4.43% | 0.8% | 75.2% | 48.3% | 1.07 | .328 | 2.32 | 2.55 | 74 | 2.54 | -0.23 | 5.88 | 6.11 | ||
Total - COL
COL
|
0 | 75 | 62.0 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 75 | 46 | 83 | 19 | 24.0% | 14.70% | 6.1% | 62.3% | 42.7% | 2.08 | .383 | 9.29 | 7.89 | 211 | 5.86 | 1.40 | -1.86 | -2.28 | ||
Total - Minors
Minors
|
0 | 587 | 717.1 | 40 | 16 | 51 | 20 | 886 | 150 | 657 | 56 | 29.7% | 5.03% | 1.9% | 75.1% | 50.0% | 1.13 | .329 | 2.97 | 3.12 | 87 | 2.69 | -0.15 | 10.04 | 10.64 |