Team | Year | Age | GS | G | IP | W | L | SV | BS | K | BB | H | HR | K% | BB% | HR% | LOB% | GB% | WHIP | BABIP | ERA | FIP | FIP- | xFIP | E-F | WAR |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Montreal - MLB
MON - MLB
|
1997 | 27 | 10 | 27 | 83.2 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 59 | 25 | 92 | 15 | 16.4% | 6.94% | 4.2% | 75.0% | 55.6% | 1.40 | .302 | 4.84 | 5.38 | 114 | 4.47 | -0.54 | -0.01 |
Cincinnati - MLB
CIN - MLB
|
1996 | 26 | 7 | 14 | 55.0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 42 | 18 | 73 | 6 | 16.9% | 7.26% | 2.4% | 70.4% | 49.5% | 1.65 | .387 | 5.24 | 4.57 | 94 | 4.63 | 0.67 | 0.66 |
Detroit - MLB
DET - MLB
|
1995 | 25 | 10 | 10 | 47.1 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 30 | 58 | 6 | 9.6% | 13.04% | 2.6% | 61.0% | 54.9% | 1.86 | .310 | 7.23 | 6.12 | 137 | 5.93 | 1.10 | -0.02 |
Detroit (1 yrs)
DET (1 yrs)
|
10 | 10 | 47.1 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 30 | 58 | 6 | 9.6% | 13.04% | 2.6% | 61.0% | 54.9% | 1.86 | .310 | 7.23 | 6.12 | 137 | 5.93 | 1.10 | -0.02 | ||
Montreal (1 yrs)
MON (1 yrs)
|
10 | 27 | 83.2 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 59 | 25 | 92 | 15 | 16.4% | 6.94% | 4.2% | 75.0% | 55.6% | 1.40 | .302 | 4.84 | 5.38 | 114 | 4.47 | -0.54 | -0.01 | ||
Cincinnati (1 yrs)
CIN (1 yrs)
|
7 | 14 | 55.0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 42 | 18 | 73 | 6 | 16.9% | 7.26% | 2.4% | 70.4% | 49.5% | 1.65 | .387 | 5.24 | 4.57 | 94 | 4.63 | 0.67 | 0.66 | ||
Total - MLB
MLB
|
27 | 51 | 186.0 | 10 | 13 | 2 | 1 | 123 | 73 | 223 | 27 | 14.7% | 8.71% | 3.2% | 69.2% | 53.8% | 1.59 | .329 | 5.56 | 5.33 | 114 | 4.89 | 0.23 | 0.63 |
Team | Year | Age | GS | G | IP | W | L | SV | BS | K | BB | H | HR | K% | BB% | HR% | LOB% | GB% | WHIP | BABIP | ERA | FIP | FIP- | xFIP | E-F | WAR |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scottsdale - TL
SCO - TL
|
2004 | 34 | 0 | 24 | 50.1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 47 | 15 | 35 | 9 | 23.5% | 7.50% | 4.5% | 88.5% | 58.4% | 0.99 | .205 | 3.04 | 4.48 | 113 | 3.76 | -1.44 | 0.00 |
Este - WDL
Est - WDL
|
2004 | 34 | 3 | 4 | 17.2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 11 | 17 | 4 | 21.0% | 13.58% | 4.9% | 53.6% | 62.9% | 1.58 | .265 | 6.11 | 2.89 | -0.06 | 3.23 | -0.16 | |
Lancaster - CALL
LaJe - CALL
|
2004 | 34 | 5 | 15 | 53.1 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 48 | 12 | 42 | 6 | 22.2% | 5.56% | 2.8% | 79.1% | 59.4% | 1.01 | .248 | 2.87 | 3.41 | 86 | 3.30 | -0.54 | 0.92 |
Tucson - PCL
TUC - PCL
|
2003 | 33 | 2 | 2 | 9.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 7 | 12 | 1 | 22.4% | 14.29% | 2.0% | 59.1% | 52.9% | 1.97 | .379 | 4.66 | 4.68 | 120 | 4.56 | -0.02 | 0.03 |
Scottsdale - TL
SCO - TL
|
2003 | 33 | 1 | 27 | 59.1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 56 | 21 | 50 | 15 | 22.5% | 8.43% | 6.0% | 72.5% | 52.6% | 1.20 | .227 | 4.70 | 5.58 | 137 | 4.16 | -0.88 | -0.62 |
Este - WDL
Est - WDL
|
2003 | 33 | 9 | 9 | 58.0 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 45 | 22 | 65 | 11 | 17.6% | 8.59% | 4.3% | 72.0% | 54.2% | 1.50 | .307 | 5.12 | 5.01 | 132 | 3.96 | 0.11 | 0.21 |
Lancaster - CALL
LaJe - CALL
|
2003 | 33 | 4 | 4 | 27.0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 26 | 8 | 20 | 4 | 23.4% | 7.21% | 3.6% | 57.4% | 60.4% | 1.04 | .225 | 5.00 | 3.92 | 99 | 3.31 | 1.08 | 0.40 |
Scottsdale - TL
SCO - TL
|
2002 | 32 | 7 | 9 | 51.1 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 45 | 8 | 46 | 3 | 21.4% | 3.81% | 1.4% | 72.5% | 52.0% | 1.05 | .289 | 2.98 | 2.67 | 63 | 3.82 | 0.31 | 1.80 |
Este - WDL
Est - WDL
|
2002 | 32 | 4 | 9 | 43.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 46 | 11 | 35 | 6 | 26.6% | 6.36% | 3.5% | 88.1% | 59.0% | 1.07 | .266 | 2.51 | 3.32 | 89 | 2.69 | -0.81 | 0.81 |
Lancaster - CALL
LaJe - CALL
|
2002 | 32 | 10 | 22 | 98.0 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 80 | 27 | 87 | 13 | 20.1% | 6.78% | 3.3% | 81.4% | 60.3% | 1.16 | .268 | 3.21 | 3.72 | 92 | 3.58 | -0.50 | 1.62 |
Este - WDL
Est - WDL
|
2001 | 31 | 6 | 6 | 40.1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24 | 24 | 30 | 4 | 13.6% | 13.64% | 2.3% | 64.8% | 52.1% | 1.34 | .211 | 4.24 | 4.95 | 118 | 5.50 | -0.71 | 0.12 |
Scottsdale - TL
SCO - TL
|
2001 | 31 | 1 | 1 | 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0.00% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.00 | .000 | 0.00 | 2.99 | 82 | 2.99 | -2.99 | 0.01 |
Tucson - PCL
TUC - PCL
|
2000 | 30 | 11 | 11 | 73.0 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 57 | 19 | 95 | 13 | 16.7% | 5.57% | 3.8% | 67.1% | 55.8% | 1.56 | .331 | 5.79 | 5.12 | 125 | 4.33 | 0.67 | 0.21 |
Scottsdale - TL
SCO - TL
|
2000 | 30 | 8 | 8 | 58.1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 51 | 17 | 49 | 8 | 21.5% | 7.17% | 3.4% | 76.6% | 65.0% | 1.13 | .260 | 3.55 | 4.15 | 111 | 3.47 | -0.60 | 0.84 |
Este - WDL
Est - WDL
|
2000 | 30 | 15 | 15 | 104.0 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 89 | 49 | 90 | 10 | 19.6% | 10.77% | 2.2% | 70.7% | 58.0% | 1.34 | .269 | 3.55 | 4.05 | 101 | 4.36 | -0.50 | 1.76 |
Reno - CALL
ReSS - CALL
|
2000 | 30 | 6 | 6 | 45.0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 42 | 15 | 43 | 8 | 22.1% | 7.89% | 4.2% | 77.4% | 57.3% | 1.29 | .282 | 4.40 | 4.80 | 124 | 3.97 | -0.40 | 0.37 |
Binghamton - EL
BiMe - EL
|
1999 | 29 | 11 | 19 | 88.1 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 54 | 22 | 73 | 15 | 14.6% | 5.96% | 4.1% | 65.8% | 37.2% | 1.08 | .213 | 4.18 | 3.91 | 93 | 4.68 | 0.27 | 1.41 |
Capital City - SAL
CCB - SAL
|
1999 | 29 | 7 | 7 | 51.0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 13 | 46 | 8 | 14.0% | 6.07% | 3.7% | 64.3% | 55.9% | 1.16 | .236 | 4.76 | 4.20 | 78 | 5.50 | 0.57 | 1.77 |
Ottawa - IL
Ott - IL
|
1998 | 28 | 25 | 25 | 157.1 | 5 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 86 | 49 | 163 | 36 | 12.6% | 7.18% | 5.3% | 66.8% | 50.8% | 1.35 | .253 | 5.26 | 5.24 | 114 | 4.67 | 0.02 | 0.99 |
Jalisco - WDL
CdJ - WDL
|
1998 | 28 | 1 | 3 | 10.2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 12 | 2 | 22.7% | 0.00% | 4.5% | 78.4% | 50.0% | 1.13 | .323 | 4.22 | 4.46 | 100 | 3.52 | -0.24 | 0.13 |
Ottawa - IL
Ott - IL
|
1997 | 27 | 4 | 4 | 32.1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 9 | 23 | 5 | 12.4% | 6.98% | 3.9% | 76.9% | 43.6% | 0.99 | .188 | 3.06 | 4.09 | 95 | 4.78 | -1.03 | 0.53 |
Indianapolis - IL
InIn - IL
|
1996 | 26 | 4 | 4 | 28.1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 4 | 21 | 2 | 14.4% | 3.60% | 1.8% | 58.6% | 45.6% | 0.88 | .214 | 3.49 | 3.30 | 71 | 4.31 | 0.19 | 0.86 |
Toledo - IL
TMH - IL
|
1996 | 26 | 0 | 3 | 6.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 26.9% | 11.54% | 3.8% | 71.4% | 50.0% | 1.05 | .200 | 4.05 | 3.84 | 83 | 3.22 | 0.21 | 0.09 |
Ottawa - IL
Ott - IL
|
1996 | 26 | 4 | 5 | 25.0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24 | 12 | 22 | 1 | 22.4% | 11.22% | 0.9% | 65.5% | 48.9% | 1.36 | .304 | 4.32 | 3.25 | 70 | 4.15 | 1.07 | 0.75 |
Toledo - IL
TMH - IL
|
1995 | 25 | 14 | 14 | 81.2 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 64 | 14 | 81 | 16 | 19.5% | 4.27% | 4.9% | 89.8% | 47.6% | 1.16 | .281 | 3.20 | 4.97 | 98 | 3.99 | -1.77 | 1.19 |
Toledo - IL
TMH - IL
|
1994 | 24 | 18 | 34 | 108.0 | 7 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 84 | 27 | 116 | 15 | 17.8% | 5.73% | 3.2% | 68.8% | 47.2% | 1.32 | .298 | 4.50 | 4.85 | 86 | 4.74 | -0.35 | 2.03 |
Toledo - IL
TMH - IL
|
1993 | 23 | 12 | 12 | 59.1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 26 | 14 | 67 | 5 | 10.3% | 5.56% | 2.0% | 68.4% | 48.2% | 1.37 | .302 | 4.10 | 4.50 | 87 | 5.11 | -0.40 | 1.23 |
London - EL
LoTi - EL
|
1993 | 23 | 24 | 24 | 117.2 | 5 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 76 | 18 | 111 | 8 | 15.8% | 3.74% | 1.7% | 71.8% | 44.9% | 1.10 | .273 | 3.14 | 3.26 | 72 | 3.85 | -0.12 | 3.52 |
London - EL
LoTi - EL
|
1992 | 22 | 28 | 28 | 208.2 | 11 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 148 | 54 | 228 | 12 | 16.4% | 5.97% | 1.3% | 70.9% | 53.2% | 1.35 | .321 | 3.84 | 3.26 | 82 | 3.40 | 0.58 | 4.85 |
None - None
None - None
|
1991 | 21 | 15 | 15 | 107.1 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 77 | 42 | 87 | 1 | 20.1% | 10.94% | 0.3% | 57.1% | 100.0% | 1.20 | .328 | 3.52 | -0.08 | -3 | -0.20 | 3.61 | 2.77 |
Total - AAA
AAA
|
94 | 114 | 581.1 | 32 | 32 | 3 | 1 | 391 | 158 | 604 | 95 | 15.7% | 6.33% | 3.8% | 69.9% | 49.3% | 1.31 | .279 | 4.51 | 4.77 | 100 | 4.53 | -0.26 | 7.91 | ||
Total - AA
AA
|
118 | 186 | 908.0 | 51 | 32 | 3 | 1 | 708 | 272 | 841 | 107 | 18.5% | 7.09% | 2.8% | 71.9% | 52.1% | 1.23 | .272 | 3.78 | 3.85 | 94 | 3.82 | -0.08 | 14.68 | ||
Total - A
A
|
32 | 54 | 274.1 | 24 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 226 | 75 | 238 | 39 | 20.0% | 6.64% | 3.5% | 74.9% | 58.8% | 1.14 | .256 | 3.81 | 3.94 | 94 | 3.92 | -0.14 | 5.10 | ||
Total - S A
S A
|
15 | 15 | 107.1 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 77 | 42 | 87 | 1 | 20.1% | 10.94% | 0.3% | 57.1% | 100.0% | 1.20 | .328 | 3.52 | -0.08 | -3 | -0.20 | 3.61 | 2.77 | ||
Total - Minors
Minors
|
259 | 369 | 1871.0 | 112 | 79 | 6 | 2 | 1402 | 547 | 1770 | 242 | 17.9% | 6.97% | 3.1% | 70.7% | 52.2% | 1.24 | .275 | 3.99 | 3.93 | 90 | 3.83 | 0.07 | 30.46 |